Lemma Soft Forums

Supporting creators of visual novels and story-based games since 2003.


Visit our new games list, blog aggregator, IRC, and wiki.
Activation problem? Email [email protected]
It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 12:34 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Tolkien discussion?
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2012 7:45 am 
Veteran

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 9:36 am
Posts: 264
Location: Κωνσταντινούπολη, Βασιλεύα των Ρωμαύων
Projects: Rzeczpospolita Polska 1647
I was wondering if there are any fans of the Tolkien Legendarium on the forum? If yes, could we discuss about anything and everything from the Silmarillion to the Lord of the Rings trilogy and everything in between here?

_________________
One Province Minor - 120 class variables and still counting!

Because there is no such thing as too many variables.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tolkien discussion?
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2012 9:05 am 
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:03 pm
Posts: 288
Location: Ireland
Projects: Secret, Secret and Secret
*Raises hand*
I still haven't finished the silmarillion yet. T_T
I've been meaning to, but there's just so many books I've been meaning to read lately.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tolkien discussion?
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2012 5:05 pm 
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:31 pm
Posts: 401
Projects: That's the Way the Cookie Crumbles, Ibuki Magica
Organization: Twin Turtle Games
I couldn't finish the Silmarillion either. Way too long and dry. It's a good set of stories, but it reads like one of the history books in the Bible rather than a Old English poem.

_________________
ImageImage Image

Petit Fours and Sushi: The best name for a Tumblog I could think of.
,%,..@@@,.Þ%,.@G,.@@,.% ...What? It makes sense to me.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tolkien discussion?
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2012 6:42 pm 
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 10:52 am
Posts: 331
Location: Germany
Projects: 1plus3
Desu_Cake wrote:
*Raises hand*
I still haven't finished the silmarillion yet. T_T
I've been meaning to, but there's just so many books I've been meaning to read lately.

That could have been my post. :'D
Funnyguts wrote:
I couldn't finish the Silmarillion either. Way too long and dry. It's a good set of stories, but it reads like one of the history books in the Bible rather than a Old English poem.

And that one too. x'D

I really liked the beginning, but I have so ridiculously much too read (8 philosophical books, 3 about psychology, around 16 about drawing, 2 about music, 3 for entertainment) and the part after the beginning (like, the whole book as far as I could see) was a little too dry to become my top priority.

Tolkien wasn't an author after all - doesn't change the fact that he was totally epic.

- R.

_________________
Image
Newest Update: "Interface preview + WIPs" (13. 9. 2012)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tolkien discussion?
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2012 8:33 pm 
Lemma-Class Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:02 am
Posts: 2550
Location: Perth, Australia
Completed: Ristorante Amore, The Elevator, Witch/Knight
Projects: Break Chance Memento
Organization: Cyanide Tea
I love the lore of his books, but he needed a really good editor... or someone to give him a word restriction or something. You can skip a good chunk of The Two Towers and you won't miss anything :/ His shorter works, like the Hobbit, are better in my opinion. The Lord of the Rings Trilogy just went on and on and on and at the worst possible moments.

_________________
The other 1/2 of Cyanide Tea l My Deviantart Account I My Tumber Account I Break Chance Memento I Ristorante Amore


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tolkien discussion?
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 12:25 am 
Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 5:43 am
Posts: 20
Location: California
Projects: Relativity
Organization: Cake+Code
I used to be a huge Tolkein fan, reading and rereading the LotR trilogy and the Hobbit over and over again on top of watching the movie so many times I've memorized a huge part of it by heart. (I also read a bit of Dwarvish!) I've fallen out of touch with his writing in the past few years, where my obsession slowly waned towards the beginning/end of college, but it still doesn't change the fact that I find the whole world of Middle-Earth to be completely captivating and so well developed. I haven't read the Silmarillion yet, but I sadly I don't have a great desire to as of right now. (Especially since I'm busy indulging in the Game of Thrones series.)

_________________
Portfolio | Tumblr


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tolkien discussion?
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2012 1:46 pm 
Veteran

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 9:36 am
Posts: 264
Location: Κωνσταντινούπολη, Βασιλεύα των Ρωμαύων
Projects: Rzeczpospolita Polska 1647
Right, first discussion question up for speculation:

What probably happened in the Fourth Age?

We know that the elves basically grew weary and left for Valinor one after the other, so that by the beginning of the 4th Age even Rivendell and Lindon were dwindling fast. On the other hand, the dwarves went on overtime and took back pretty much everything worth taking in the North.

We also know that the reign of Aragorn was perfect - almost too perfect in most regards - Arnor and Gondor were reunited, Minas Tirith became even more of a Giant Towering City Of Concentrated Awesome than it used to be in the 3rd, Harad and Rhun basically about-faced and bowed to Gondor...

And we also know that an Age of the Children of Iluvatar kind of has to end with a cataclysmic event. But with everything priming for fluffy lambs, sunshine, rainbow and unicorns, what would have brought an end to the 4th, in your opinion?

_________________
One Province Minor - 120 class variables and still counting!

Because there is no such thing as too many variables.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tolkien discussion?
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2012 3:42 pm 
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:31 pm
Posts: 401
Projects: That's the Way the Cookie Crumbles, Ibuki Magica
Organization: Twin Turtle Games
Isn't the fourth age still going? It's what we're in now, we just don't know it because we've modernized and the Hobbits have gone to hide from the Big Folk and such.

_________________
ImageImage Image

Petit Fours and Sushi: The best name for a Tumblog I could think of.
,%,..@@@,.Þ%,.@G,.@@,.% ...What? It makes sense to me.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tolkien discussion?
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2012 10:06 pm 
Veteran

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 9:36 am
Posts: 264
Location: Κωνσταντινούπολη, Βασιλεύα των Ρωμαύων
Projects: Rzeczpospolita Polska 1647
Well, according to some of the Professor's notes, (i) Arda is more like a parallel Earth than our Earth, and that while he had entertained the idea that ME is prehistoric Earth, he kinda sorta dropped it in the end, and (ii) according to some other notes of his, the modern age in that parallel world would have been something like the Sixth or Seventh age.

_________________
One Province Minor - 120 class variables and still counting!

Because there is no such thing as too many variables.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tolkien discussion?
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2012 10:54 pm 
Eileen-Class Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 2:47 pm
Posts: 1310
Auro-Cyanide wrote:
I love the lore of his books, but he needed a really good editor... or someone to give him a word restriction or something. You can skip a good chunk of The Two Towers and you won't miss anything :/ His shorter works, like the Hobbit, are better in my opinion. The Lord of the Rings Trilogy just went on and on and on and at the worst possible moments.


I agree with this so much. The Hobbit was the first fantasy book I ever read, and I adore it. It is also the only book Tolkien specifically wrote for children and that had an editor chopping it up - which is a big reason it is the shortest, most entertaining, and enjoyably well-written of his books. I didn't read the LoTR books until after the first movie had come out, but I could never finish them. I mean, Tolkien starts with a chapter on tobacco farming, which has nothing to do with the story or book except hobbits grow tobacco. Later he spends a chapter or two describing the trees in a forest - and it isn't even a magical or unusual forest, just a normal one, and again, it has no purpose in the story. It's basically just nature porn. Not to mention all the times he randomly breaks into epic length poetry in the middle of a section. My enjoyment was also hampered by the fact that I had read dozens of fantasy books before that, all of them aping Tolkien's world building and races and doing it better. That's not Tolkien's fault, but it meant his mythology didn't blow me away or strike me as particularly good after seeing other authors copy them from Tolkien and improve and refine them.

I actually took a college course on the mythology of Tolkien and his writing - we studied and dissected all his works and the Silmarillion. It didn't really improve my view of his writing. The Silmarillion is a confusing mess, even breaking it down into charts and graphs. Every character in it has half a dozen names in different languages he almost randomly switches between, so that you can read an entire passage about a seeming large group of people and discover later that in reality it was only a couple of people being called every name under the sun. To be fair to Tolkien, I don't think he ever intended for the Silmarillion to be published, and it mainly served as his encyclopedia of knowledge for his world.

I can respect Tolkien for originating so much of the fantasy genre, but I'm extremely disappointed in his writing itself. I believe if he had written every book with an attempt to make it accessible to children and had a good editor willing to chop up passages and reign Tolkien's excesses in, all of his books could have been as amazing as the Hobbit.

I think the LoTR books became so very popular because of the IDEAS contained within them, and not because of Tolkien's writing ability, but in spite of it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group