Lemma Soft Forums

I'm working with justified text. Using a -0.2 kerning, the result is somewhat corrupted. See the attached pictures: Fig. 1 uses the default kerning. Fig. 2 uses a -0.2 kerning. If I don't justify text, everything is fine.

Fig. 1 [default kerning]


Fig. 2 [-0.2 kerning]

Just to confirm, is this with 6.13.8?

Also, is this actually wrong? Ren'Py's justification ensures that all lines are the same length, but it doesn't pad them out to any particular width. (Which might be something to add, come to think of it.) It looks like what's happening here is that the reduced kerning allowed Ren'Py to create a longer longest line, and then everything else is being laid out properly.

Consider supplying an xmaximum to the text, so that it can't overflow.

_________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face in marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming" - Theodore Roosevelt

I'm using 6.13.8.1675.
Also, the containing frame is supplying xmaximum and xminimum (438 pixels), but I tried supplying an xmaximum to the text itself (the same 438 pixels). The result is the same: the text overflows (more than 500 pixels).

EDIT: it seems to me that the modified kerning is forcing Ren'Py to miscalculate the width. an xmaximum of 438 renders to 500+, but if I reduce it to 380, the result is what I was trying to obtain. There seems to be an offset.