Lemma Soft Forums

Because the main character shows a lot of actions as well and not drawing or showing those means you have to use tricks to imply they're there.

In first person view you already see the other characters do this now and then, but now in third person view, you will see it happen much more. This is because the main character does a lot of actions as well. People can usually understand these things, but tolerance also has a limit, and when things like this happen too often it can become jarring quickly.

Furthermore, in first person view the main character's actions can be hand-waved more easily with a sfx or something, because you're not looking at him directly. As for third person view, you would have to draw a lot more sprites so that you don't use loopholes and tricks for actions too often.

Also, imagine all the interactions you would have to show because of this. In first person view, a hug can be simply expressed by moving the sprite opposite of you closer and giving it a matching expression. In third person view, moving sprites closer to each other to represent a hug just feels more off.



There's another problem; even if you do this, as AxemRed already mentioned, it still means the sprites will be divided into two groups, which might cause some problems (like during an argument between three parties).

_________________

Nanolife | Dev Blog | Pegasi's website | Twitter

I actually don't think one way is better than another. The both have pros and cons. To me both first and third person perspective has major issues with showing action, but that is the deal with using static 2D sprites. We are not using animated anything. Unless you are willing to draw the sprites sitting, eating, sleeping, even breathing, there are actions that are going to have to be implied (rather crudely really). And that's not counting the other times in the story when a character might bend over, use chopsticks instead of a fork, gently nudge one friend, hold someone's hand, all the other movements. But this doesn't really matter because in this medium we have to trust the player to 'get it' and they will. They understand the limitations of the gameplay and if they don't, this isn't the type of game for them. We can only do the best with what we have.

While third person may have issues with dividing into groups and talking to backs, first person has issues with people talking to each other. If everyone is facing forward, it can be a little harder to have to people on screen talk to each other convincingly. You usually have to have both forward and side facing sprites, or be cheap like me and have them angled and just have their eyes move. I have never had a player mention that it's a problem for them to understand what is going on. Sure it would be nice to show absolutely everything, but as soon as you start adding details, the more the lack of other details will stand out. It's a fine balance between showing what needs to be shown and allowing the player to use their imgination to fill in the gaps. In my opinon of course

_________________
The other 1/2 of Cyanide Tea l My Deviantart Account I My Tumber Account I Break Chance Memento I Ristorante Amore

I'm glad lots of people posted here, I'm doing my game this way, face to face, I hope I don't get much work..
in any event I'm a noob, I really don't know so I'll ask:
Is there a code in ren'py for automatically flipping a picture horizontally?
I'll have to use many pictures if there isn't.

Ever played Corpse Party for the PSP?

That game did it really well, mostly because you don't play as 1 character, but as multiple characters...

_________________

Oh yeah, That was wonderful, Corpse party, I mean.
I enjoy games like those, I only played it once but it caught my eye.

@zankizuna;
Flip can do that:

http://www.renpy.org/wiki/renpy/doc/ref ... ns/im.Flip

I don't know how to do it in ATL.

Susan

_________________
In order to understand recursion, one must first understand recursion. (Anonymous)

In ATL, you should be able to do it with xzoom -1

_________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face in marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming" - Theodore Roosevelt