Pick the forum members' brains for your game :)

Forum organization and occasional community-building.
Forum rules
Questions about Ren'Py should go in the Ren'Py Questions and Announcements forum.
Message
Author
User avatar
LVUER
King of Lolies
Posts: 4538
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 9:57 pm
Completed: R.S.P
Location: Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
Contact:

Re: Pick the forum members' brains for your game :)

#31 Post by LVUER » Sun Jul 21, 2013 3:27 am

TsukiShima wrote:I've been wondering, what actually happens to the clothes if we don't wash them?
Take a perfectly clean shirt, you wore it for a short time, say, for a photography session and while wearing it, you sweat a lot. But because it doesn't look too dirty, and there's no stains or any chemicals on it, you decided not to wash it. Then later you wear it again. And again, you decide not to clean it. Will something happen to the clothes in a long period? :/
1. It will be stink. Believe me, especially when the one who's wearing it is a guy.
2. It will be dirty, of course. Especially the neck part. Even if the rest looks clean, usually the neck part will be yellowish... and it's very hard to wash that out.
3. It will have lots of tiny black spots (fungi), depending on the weather and how much you sweat. Oh, and even if you don't think you're sweating, you actually sweat even if it's just a little. Usually these black tiny spots appear on the place where the cloth usually wet by sweat and if you have a bad habit, on the place where you wipe your hand on it.
4. It will get damaged easier and lost the texture and color. AKA go bad.
"Double the princesses, quadruple the fun!" - Haken Browning (SRW-OG Endless Frontier)

DeviantArt Account
MoeToMecha Blog (under construction)
Lolicondria Blog (under construction) <- NSFW

User avatar
Carassaurat
Veteran
Posts: 250
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:06 pm
Location: the Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Pick the forum members' brains for your game :)

#32 Post by Carassaurat » Fri Aug 02, 2013 12:45 pm

TsukiShima wrote:What do you think about the historical figure, Joan of Arc? What does your religion think about her?
I've been doing a research about her and browse through what Islam thought about her, whether she's really a holy warrior or she was idealistic. Since she was a Christian, I wanted to know how other religions viewed her. Yes, her existence, histories, and noble sacrifice is really something to admire. In fact, as a female, I really do. To fight alongside with the males, and to have no one believed her at first must been hard for her. She was someone who was considered good, and religious at that. The Christians themselves are divided into two, if I'm not wrong. So how does the Christians themselves think about her?
Apologies for reviving this thread, but I've been meaning to write an answer for this post and hadn't gotten around to it yet. The 'problem' with Joan of Arc is how much myth has taken over. Even academic works are notoriously biased when it comes to her. Therefore, I can only recommend that, if you're really into this topic, you read the actual inquisition report, translated by Daniel Hobbins as "The Trial of Joan of Arc" (this version isn't the entire translation, since for some letters it only gives summaries; but all of Joan's words are there. A complete translation of all Latin documents can be found in W.P. Barrett, "The Trial of Jeanne d'Arc" (which I haven't read myself), but Hobbins adds text from a French version too). Anyway, what is easily noticeable when reading the trial is that Joan was no easy costumer, frequently refusing to answer or to swear oaths, and maintaining that she'd never tell everything. As the trial went on, her answers became more detailed and elaborate. For example, the voices: at first, she claimed to have heard one voice, from God, accompanied by light. A few days later, there are two voices, they do not come from God, but from the saints Margaret and Catherine. She sees them occasionally, as we see normal people, but only remembers their faces and that they were wearing crowns; she couldn't say if they had arms and such or what hairdos they had. Later still, Joan also claimed to have seen Saint Michael. It's quite odd that she didn't know anything about their bodies, because at a later stage she said she embraced the saints, which would surely require them to, err, have bodies. The final part of the trial record has her turn her back on the voices, claiming that they deceived her. Another example: if Joan was sent by God, she'd needed a miracle to prove that. She refused to talk of her miracle in the early stages of the trial, but eventually claimed that it had taken the form of a crown she gave to Charles VII when they were alone; at another point, she said that the crown was given to the archbishop of Rheims who gave it to Charles with many knights and lords in attendance. The whole trial record is full of contradictions, large and small and certainly more lies than you'd expect from a saint. It may seem like a cruel process, but she was condemned to a life locked up by the inquisition, and I don't know if we'd do things much different today if someone claimed to be hearing voices telling her to wage war.

Secondly, while the trial has been traditionally seen as biased, that is really quite unfair. By Medieval canon law, a 'neutral' court would probably have proclaimed her guilty too. As far as I can tell, all 12 points that the University of Paris made, ranging from her dislike of the Burgundians being in contradiction of the command to love one's neighbour, to a blind obedience to voices and apparitions which were in no way proven to be sent from above, to a habit of wearing men's clothing against all law, hit home according to Medieval views. The nullification trial was far more politically motivated and biased than the original trial was. The idea of her sainthood is a 19th century construction and has everything to do with (bourgeois) French nationalism and very little with the actual person Joan of Arc. Even then, the advocatus diaboli made some good points when he pointed out that prophecy does not guarantee holiness, because it cannot be tested, and that she was lacking in some of the necessary virtues; for example, Joan jumped from a tower in Beaurevoir, when a saint certainly shouldn't show any desperation like that.

Anyway, that's not to say Joan of Arc didn't do some incredible impressive things or that she didn't show an admirable amount of willpower. But at the same time, she was also a pretty big liar during her trial, and that's assuming she didn't even make up her voices in the first place. This may not quite be the kind of answer you were asking for, but dammit, it's so rare to get some use out of my degree :p .

User avatar
KimiYoriBaka
Miko-Class Veteran
Posts: 636
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 8:15 pm
Projects: Castle of Arhannia
Contact:

Re: Pick the forum members' brains for your game :)

#33 Post by KimiYoriBaka » Sat Aug 24, 2013 4:51 pm

I've been trying to research this for a while, and only just remembered this thread was here. I'm currently working on a supernatural mystery that will use the same system as my Leave the Room games (point-and-click, with four directions to look from every position). I'm trying to be very consistent on the dimensions of everything, so I'm going to model everything in 3-d and then use choice angles for reference to draw the background.

my question is this:
is there anything I could use as a guide to the average accepted dimensions of architecture throughout the last century?

my location is an old run-down hotel on the outskirts of town. I've been told that the hotel in my story would work best if it was made at least 50 years ago and renovated since then, but not much. I know nothing about architecture, but the numbers I've been seeing so far are like this:
hallways:
4 foot wide is too narrow
5 foot wide is old
6 foot wide is wheelchair friendly and commercial friendly
doors:
mostly around 32 in. if old, but it sounds like the current standards require 36 in. for wheelchairs.


oh, and one other thing. there will be blood splatter both old and new. if possibly I'd like to match up the splatter with the cause (so players can examine it if they so choose), so is there any good place to learn how blood splatters?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users