DaFool wrote:It's just rough, but if that's the style, so be it.
If you look at it for its perspectives and sense of proportions it is very good.
Nnn...
I'll start by saying that I'm not being snarky for the sake of it, but I also am, if that makes sense. I mean your project no ill will, of course, and I don't want to say "I could do better!" 'cause even if I could time contraints prevent me, but I am intentionally being probably more critical than an amateur effort really deserves for the sake of providing hopefully-useful feedback to both you and your artist.
I like sketchy linework, myself, so I have nothing against that... although I wonder how appropriate it is over photographic backgrounds. The colouring looks a bit hit-and-miss - some areas have sketchy lines coloured over, as if the colours are (for example) on a separate multiply layer, but other areas have white/grey uncoloured pixels that throw the eye. I'd also suggest that while it would take a little bit longer, the appreciable gains of adding shading to the colouring would probably be well worth the extra time spent. I know you have a lot of sprites, but flat colours on a shaded background really does rather unnecessarily pop out the fact that they're different media.
The main thing, though, is that I'd disagree with the 'very good' on the perspective. It's not
bad, don't get me wrong, but:
http://www.eviscerate.net/scraps/20070109b.jpg
RED is where I'd imagine the torso to be from the lines drawn. On the left arrow, there's apparently a bit of shirt bunched up suspended in mid-air... I'd suggest this is probably supposed to be the guy's right hand, and should be flesh-coloured. On the right arrow, the print on the t-shirt seems to extend right around the figure's side under his arm. Is this intentional? It looks kind of weird, I've owned plenty of printed t-shirts and the realities of screen printing mean that the printed parts are usually more or less centred on the front.
GREEN is the lines that pass through the shoulders, hips, knees and ankles. For that kind of pose, they should really all meet up at the same vanishing point. If they don't, one would expect them to fan out evenly... that they don't do either suggests that the guy is twisted in a rather uncomfortable manner.
BLUE is the most obvious error - the feet aren't lined up with the direction the legs are facing at all, but rather both twisted around to the figure's right side. Maybe he's had both his ankles snapped, I don't know, but it looks pretty painful whatever happened to them.
Now, I know just how hard feet are to draw, and perspective poses, and it looks fine at first glance... I just don't think 'very good perspective and proportions' is a particularly fair description of it. It's characterful, though, and I
do like the casual sketchy style. Proportions do look pretty good to my eye, so long as he's supposed to be on the tall side.