Ah, the happiest thing to read at the top of a critique...TheTourist wrote:Hi! Also: wow!
You know, I never thought about what people might think of her design. But since I came up with it in what I want to say was my sophomore year of high school and those particular sketches are senior-year era, I guess I can see how someone might look at it and groan, "Oh no!"TheTourist wrote: After seeing the scans of a wide-eyed cat girl, I admit some amount of, um, trepidation. The story, however, was sweet and clever and fairly well written. In fact, transferring the AI's consciousness to the animal's body was a downright inspired twist. Over all, it's a wonderful series of vignettes about the weirdness of love.
Hm, I think you're right. That's the plot talking and not the character. I was struggling a bit since I'm not quite sure that if you were teaching an AI, you would want to beat around the bush too much when answering questions (since you don't want to confuse it, and besides, an AI won't judge you no matter how honest you are) but I do see now how it's rather unnecessary for him to explicitly say things like that.TheTourist wrote: Some critiques, though: you're doing this from the AI's point-of-view, so what we know about the programmer we can only glean from his inputs. I totally agree with your choice, but sometimes Master's dialogue was too on the nose. We don't need the programmer to say "I am lonely." Master, after all, programmed a robot to love him. We can guess at a few of his motivations. And besides, when Master talks about the real cat later, it quite obviously reflects himself.
I'll definitely keep this in mind for the rewrite. I was going for "I am a computer, and I make obvious comments" because I thought it would be cute, but I don't want to accidentally insult or annoy the readers. I hope once I rework the script you will return to comment on whether or not I've been successful in this area.TheTourist wrote: Some of Twelve's observations, too, dwell too obviously on its love for Master. Clearly, it's supposed to be in love, and was programmed to love, but hitting us over the head with (barely sexual) childlike love again and again is sometimes too much.
Thank you ^_^TheTourist wrote: Originally, also, I was going to critique the easy definition of love that Master offers, but looking back on it, it sets up the ending well. So: NICE.
Although, since it jumped out at you, maybe that means his response was too "conveniently blatant" for the purposes of the plot, and I could perhaps rewrite that scene so that his definition is arrived at after some discussion rather than just delivered? I'm trying to toe that troublesome line between "poetically brief" and "some semblance of real life". If you lean too far one way, it's too elementary, and if you lean too far the other, it's too waterlogged... pacing is so easy to critique in someone else's work but so hard to pinpoint in one's own...
I did not - I thought it was sweet and childlike, and I liked the sort of tragic echo it lent to her dialogue.TheTourist wrote: (By the way, did you mean for the AI's "Master" label for its creator to be that creepy and unnerving?)
This is probably because the original story I wrote in high school was much more character-centric, so you knew more about the programmer, and Twelve was more humanized, so I think "Master" came across more as an affectionate term and it just stuck in my mind as such since then.
I have to ask, though... is it creepy and unnerving in a good way, or does it just squick you out?
Well, it makes me really happy to hear that. ;w;TheTourist wrote: That's the most I can critique it, though, for what it sets out to accomplish, it achieves.
Thanks for taking the time to read and give me your thoughts. Your critiques on my writing were just the kind I was hoping to receive!

