papillon wrote:This is *not* a whodunnit where you read up to the fireside sitdown chapter, stick a bookmark in, think really hard about everything that's happened until that point, and then if you're clever enough come up with the Holmesian reasoning of what really happened.
In my opinion, it's not a whodunnit at all. It's a crazy, senseless muddle of weirdness that fools the reader/player into believing he can somehow logically unravel it while it's
plain impossible until the game chooses to throw a piece of true evidence into the reader/player's face out of nowhere - something he didn't even have to work for. And that piece of evidence doesn't even
explain any of the former weirdness; it is only the key that makes the killer finally break down and spill the beans.
"A large number of readers pegged the right culprit because it was obvious that he had the most opportunity, even though nobody picked up on the only actual evidence which was available other than Kirigiri. (It wasn't 'no' evidence before the trial, it was 'ludicrously subtle' evidence.)"
Yeah, he had the most opportunity, but neither motive nor even a bit of motivation aside from the secret revealed. In fact, he even liked the victim, right until the moment before the murder when the victim said something innocent that, by the power of shitty writing, made the killer snap because it incidentally related to exactly the secret he didn't want anyone to know about - the secret the player/reader had no chance of knowing beforehand. Yeah, you could guess the killer, but you could never, not once, be sure of it until the reveal.
And that "ludicrously subtle evidence" also wasn't evidence at all but another unrelated personality quirk that, at best, could draw suspicion towards the killer. But it was so subtle that it wasn't even a game element! You had no chance of adding that to your "gathered evidence", and that in a game where the evidence you gather is used as "ammunition" in the action sequences that dominate the court sequences! The game told you that this was not evidence, even if you might have THOUGHT that it was! Ace Attorney pulled a cheap trick like that one in "Trials and Tribulations" too when you overlook a piece of evidence because "it was behind a tree" and you had no chance of even trying to look behind that tree. I groaned a lot when that happened. But that was one piece of evidence, and hardly the only decisive one, and it was not necessary to correctly identify the killer - only to put the final nail into his coffin.
What Dangan Ronpa does is much,
much worse. It's the writers of the game making fun of the intellect of their readers/players. That's a lousy thing to do.
Scriptwriter and producer of Metropolitan Blues
Creator of The Loyal Kinsman
Scriptwriter and director of Daemonophilia
Scriptwriter of
Zenith Chronicles
Scriptwriter and director of
Romance is DeadScriptwriter and producer of Adrift
More about me in my blog"Adrift - Like Ever17, but without the Deus Ex Machina" - HigurashiKira