M12 wrote:It's just about the difference between the VN and anime's Nagisa (from Clannad). Also, are Key's works touching or just cliche? Check it out if you have a few minutes to spare. Thanks .
I like to think that it's just another interpretation of Nagisa's character. My Nagisa (my interpretation of Nagisa) might be different than yours, and therefore so too the reproduction to another format by each producers and seiyuu. If we played the nonvoiced version of Clannad VN first, maybe we'll think that the Nagisa voicing/seiyuu is not suitable because it's different from our mental image and so on.
Is it touching or cliche? Let's see..
My first experience with KEY is through the translation of Planetarian, and then Clannad. Their works have similar pattern to my most favorite anime/manga series Honey and Clover. As drama-comedy, they are rich with everyday life detail, comedic situation and characters that makes us 'enjoy the ride', and sudden transition to serious/melancholic/romantic setup. Hachikuro doesn't have KEY's ridiculously long play/readtime because of the limitation and advantage of both medium though.
They also have a common factor, which demands much of the reader's emotional involvement in order to enjoy the story. Readers are expected to maintain the
suspension of disbelief through comedy and internal consistency. Clannad's VN presentation are considered a success for me, but Kanon's anime series failed. Why? Because in the marathon-watching I can't stop questioning the logic behind Kanon's characters.
For an example, let me compare my experience with Clannad to Kanon from my subjective, incomplete and misguided (haven't played Kanon VN yet) point of view. Using the [THE THREE QUESTIONS READERS ASK] section of Orson Scott Card - Characters and Viewpoint book (spoiler warning):
Clannad - Tomoyo path
Question 1: So What? It's a doomed relationship from the beginning. I wonder how this will resolve?
Question 2: Oh Yeah? Ah, so that's why Tomoyo did it. That's so unexpected, but really logical if you see it from her point of view. Awesome.
Question 3: Huh? LOL. The transition is smooth. The events are interesting. Sunohara isn't forgotten for romance convenience but keep appearing with his comedy. Each cool stuffs are distributed evenly to all scenes. The writers did a good job.
Kanon - Shiori path
Question 1: So What? She's cute. She and Yuuichi can banter equally. So what's her secret? - PASS
Question 2: Oh Yeah? WTF? So she has only a short amount of time to live? If it's that deadly of a sickness how come the complication is so light? I can't believe she's dying! What a convenient plot device.
Question 3: Huh? What happen? I can't make sense of it. How could Yuuichi accept the related fact so easily and not realize how unlogical it is? Why aren't there any skeptic attitude and questions like how Clannad's Tomoya to Fuuko's case or what they did excellently with Kyon's thought in Suzumiya Haruhi series?
I compare Tomoyo to Shiori because they both: a) have no past connection with the main character, b) doesn't necessarily need mystical element to become an excellent story, and c) passed the first question, therefore become character I care about. Too bad I consider Shiori's story execution a failure.
For me, to trust the characters and the story enough, instead of continuously doubting it, is the only way to enjoy any story. Stories that successfuly guide you to that stage will led you to overlook even the melodrama and cliche stuffs they used. Clannad's anime is a complete pleasure because I have trusted and touched by the VN translation. If I didn't read the VN first and jump straight to the anime, the case might be different. So too it applies other KEY's work: Kanon and Air.
PS: Between excellent retelling of an otherwise cliched material to a fresh, new, original, diverse, unique concept; KEY's work is focused heavily on the first one. A story doesn't need to be "wow, I never think about that!" element to be considered excellent.