(Usual disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, just a guy with an academic and personal interest in the field)
Cybeat wrote:
I have copyright over the images already? I thought I needed to license my work first.
In countries who have implemented the terms of the
Berne Convention (
pretty much every country on the planet has signed it) copyright is assigned automatically to anyone who produces a creative work, and that copyright is recognised in any other Berne signatory country. So if I draw a picture in the UK, I automatically have copyright over that picture without having to even understand what copyright
is, and some guy in Australia is bound by his country's law to respect that copyright. (There are other conventions which further clarify or extend these protections, but Berne is effectively the big daddy of them all.) The US only succumbed in the late eighties, about a century after the original convention, but even there, copyright is now automatically assigned.
A
license, on the other hand, is an agreement between you and a second party as to what that second party is allowed to do with something you have copyright over. The word basically means 'permission to do something' - to drive a car on the state's roads you need a state driving license, to own a gun in the state's territory you need a state gun license, to make a copy of someone else's copyrighted work you need a copyright license from the owner of that work.
So you, as the copyright holder, don't need a license for anything to do with that work - it's yours, you can do what you want with it, and you can exert those rights afforded by copyright law over it as you see fit. However, if you want to give it to other people, it's customary to define the permissions you're giving them in the form of a license, so that they know what they can and can't do with it. If there's no license, they can't reproduce it at all, and technically this would also mean that they can't download it to their computer, because that involves making a copy of the work from your website to their PC. Generally it's considered that making something available for free download with no license confers an implied license to download and use it, even if they're not then allowed to redistribute it themselves... but I have no idea as to the exact legal status there.
Cybeat wrote:
By any chance, do you what's the best place (site) to license my work?
What you should really be asking is "what's the best license for my work", and that's something we can only really advise you on, not tell you. As PyTom suggested, you need to decide what you want other people to be able to do with your work. Should they be allowed to give copies to their friends? Should they be allowed to modify it and distribute the modified version? Should they be allowed to use it commercially (which includes things like "make it available on a website which also shows paid advertisements")? Further, do you want anything in return - for example, most open-source licenses include a clause whereby you're not responsible for anything bad that happens as a result of using your software, which is a pretty sensible thing to put in there somewhere.
If you had a lawyer or were confident of your contract-drawing skills, you could write your own - but safer is to pick an off-the-shelf license that covers the terms that you want to distribute your work under. Personally, I like the
Creative Commons suite, they have loads of licenses that you can pick and choose between. The Open Source Initiative maintains a list of
open-source software licenses which are designed specifically for software, which might also be useful. The other option being for you to describe exactly what you want end-users to be able to do with your work, and ask for someone to suggest a particular license to use.