However, comparing the Holocaust to the Slaughterhouse is far from tactful, or even correct.
If you have a weak stomach, don't read this. But Wright, I want you to read this:
So you are saying that you are wiser than people like Socrates, Aristotle, Plato, Leo Tolstoy, GB Shaw, John Milton, Einstein, the list can go on and on.Gear wrote:It's just a matter of how you think. Some believe animals should have the same rights (to an extent, they don't need to vote) as a human to life. Others (such as myself) see humans eating animals as no different than a tiger eating an antelope (or whatever tigers eat, I'm no biology major).
So was someone else, at least from the 1930s and on...Wright1000 wrote:So you are saying that you are wiser than people like Socrates, Aristotle, Plato, Leo Tolstoy, GB Shaw, John Milton, Einstein, the list can go on and on.
All these great people were vegetarians...
I won't go into detail here and point out that humans didn't actually evolve from monkeys (rather, humans and monkeys have common ancestors), but great apes are much closer to humans than monkeys. And most great apes (the gorilla, for instance) have a rather diverse diet... including tasty insects.Talking about biology, the great biologist Charles Darwin was also a vegetarian because he knew that humans have evolved from monkeys and MONKEYS ARE VEGETARIANS!
Does that mean Atheists are off the hook?Wright1000 wrote:If you are a Christian, did you forget this-- Though shall not kill.
Each and every religion speaks against animal slaughter.
"Each and every religion" is sort of pushing it especially when you consider that early in early Judaism animal sacrifices were common. And don't even get me started on the Old Testament where the mentions of the first Passover involved butchering a lamb for the Passover Feast. (I am Christian by the way)Wright1000 wrote:If you are a Christian, did you forget this-- Though shall not kill.
Each and every religion speaks against animal slaughter.
You're perfectly right - we don't have to. We can choose to live as vegetarians and still have a healthy diet. "Omnivore" means you can essentially eat everything and also choose not to eat something because there are many other things that can supply our bodies with the same nutrients. We can even choose not to eat meat because we feel it's morally wrong to kill living things that can feel pain only to eat if we have a choice to eat something else.Wright1000 wrote:That doesn't mean we HAVE to eat animals.
Answered properly by MaiMai. I might add that "each and every religion" is, again, much too broad a definition as Judaism requires kosher butchering of animals you eat, which I believe PETA dismisses as cruelty against animals.If you are a Christian, did you forget this-- Though shall not kill.
Each and every religion speaks against animal slaughter.
I can show you ten writers of Shaw's caliber that ate meat.If you think you are a greater writer than GB Shaw, show me your Nobel Prizes.
FYI, that would be in North Sumatera, Indonesia. The culture allows them to consume dogs, even some of the pet dogs.DarkSpartan wrote:In places where dog is considered a viable dietary choice
Users browsing this forum: No registered users