I have a head full of myths and fairy tales from all over the world. (Semi-photographic memory. I remember almost every story I read -- or watch.) There's no story out there I can't find a root tale for.athenastar17 wrote:Lol, true, true. I was trying to think of something that didn't have much of a known precursor, but I guess that's about as possible as trying to write an "original" work XDOokamiKasumi wrote: Actually one could look at Frankenstein as being a Pygmalion gone bad? So even that wasn't wholly original. However, the Execution and where the author took that story WAS original!
On that we definitely agree. No two writers come up with stories the same way, or put them on paper the same way because no two Minds think or dream alike.athenastar17 wrote:... I think it's a matter of personal style and what works best for you... I'm fine with agreeing to disagree here on what's "best," since...well, I guess I don't think there IS a "best" way, as long as it works for the writer.
Oh... That actually explains quite a lot! I never could get comfortable playing D&D, though I love the idea of it because I just couldn't handle letting someone else write my story. I'm something of a control freak, I guess. I don't like it at all when my characters suddenly spin out of my control. However, they tend to only do that in my fan-fiction.athenastar17 wrote:It might also be of note, for context, that one of the reasons I believe so strongly in this is because I'm very accustomed to doing writing for Dungeons and Dragons, where the plot MUST bow to the will of the players, otherwise it becomes...not fun.
Ah... I don't have problems with endings at all, usually because I know where I want to end it before I begin typing. However, my climax scenes can and do suddenly change on me. Normally because I come up with one better.athenastar17 wrote:I won't say the characters-first style is without flaws. I always have trouble writing climaxes and endings, since the story is written in a way that allows it to never really end. But that might also be because my stories are so long and detailed in the first place, I don't have half as much practice ENDING them as beginning and developing them. (As if you can't tell by my wall 'o text posts...my apologies... *bow, bow*)
Jim Butcher, Stephen King, and Laurell K Hamilton are character-first authors -- which is why Ms Hamilton is having so many problems tying up the loose ends in her "Anita Blake" series. Mr. Butcher plots a bit more heavily, but he does talk about how his characters will take off on him when he's not looking. Mr. King makes no bones about the fact that he writes almost strictly character-based stories, and that he sometimes has problems finding ends for his tales because of it.athenastar17 wrote:The best published examples of the character-first style for those interested, I think, are Baccano and Durararara...and any other works by those same creators, really. It's kind of their thing. I'm sure there are books that follow the same lines, but I can't think of any off the top of my head.
Edgar Allen Poe, however, is a plot-first writer, and a die-hard one at that. He's my personal role-model.
